Recently, the Supreme Court of Texas released the final version for amendments to the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, namely Rule 53.2-.3, which provides the required contents of a petition for review and response to a petition for review. The Court added a new mandatory requirement that parties must include an introduction section.
Continue Reading The K.I.S.S. Method?
Don’t be the case with a broken record.
There’s a certain excitement as a trial lawyer when your witness is on the stand, effectively using an exhibit to lay out your case. You can see the jury leaning in, the judge looking over, and know that they are fully engaged.
The problem is that the courtroom magic doesn’t always translate into a cold appellate record. Take this example, where a plaintiff explained to the jury where a particular incident happened in a boundary dispute:…
Continue Reading Don’t be the case with a broken record.
Avoiding Snares and Pitfalls in Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Findings of fact and conclusions of law (“FFCL”) play a crucial role in error preservation following a bench trial. This post addresses some of the procedural snares and substantive traps that continue to catch skilled attorneys.
Continue Reading Avoiding Snares and Pitfalls in Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
“But wait, there’s more.”
Recently, I handled an appeal that was (how should I say this)… a mixed bag. That’s not uncommon. Most times, there are multiple issues at stake and multiple ways you can win… or lose. One particular issue in this mixed-bag appeal required that I defend the factual sufficiency of the evidence supporting my client’s award of attorney’s fees.
Continue Reading “But wait, there’s more.”